The Man Who Made Fossil Fish Famous

Our Archaeopteryx show has bedazzling fossils – the only Archaeopteryx skeleton in the New World, complete with clear impressions of feathers. Plus frog-mouthed pterodactyls, fast-swimming Sea Crocs, and slinky land lizards. Today we learn about the Louis Agassiz and his theories.

Louis Agassiz (1807-1873)

Paris and the Lure of Fish, 1836
Agassiz grew up in Switzerland where he excelled as a student in  chemistry and natural history. He went to Paris to study fish fossils under the Father of Paleontology, Baron Georges Cuvier. The geological history of fish seemed muddled at the time. Agassiz brought order to the fins and scales.

“There’s order in the way fish changed through the ages…” Agassiz concluded. He was the first to map out the long history of fish armor, fish jaws and fish tails.

1) The earliest time periods, the Paleozoic Era, most bony fish carried heavy armor in the form of thick scales covered with dense, shiny bone.

2) In the middle Periods, the Mesozoic, the armored fish became rarer and were replaced by fish with thin, flexible scales.

3) In the later Periods, the Cenozoic, thin-scaled fish took over in nearly all habitats.

4) Today, the old-fashioned thick scales persist only in a few fresh-water fish like the gar.

5) Tails changed too. The oldest bony fish had shark-like tails, with the vertebral column bending upwards to support the top of the fin. Later fish had more complicated tail bones, braced by special flanges, and the base of the tail was more symmetrical.

6) Jaws in the earliest bony fish were stiff, like the jaws of crocodiles. Later fish developed jaw bones that could swing outwards and forwards.

Discovery of the Ice Age
As he traveled across Europe, Agassiz saw evidence of giant ice sheets that had covered the mountains and plains. According to Agassiz’s theory, New England too had been invaded by mile-high ice layers. Giant hairy elephants – woolly mammoths – had frolicked in the frigid habitats. At first,  scholars harrumphed at Agassiz’s idea of a Glacial Period.  But by the mid 1840’s the theory was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Boston 1846: Toast of the Town & the New Museum
Fish and glaciers made Agassiz the most famous scientist of his time. When he came to Boston in the 1846, his lectures were so successful that the New England intellectuals wouldn’t let him leave. Poets and politicians, rich merchants and artists all helped raise funds to get Agassiz a professorship at Harvard. He repaid the support by working tirelessly to build a grand laboratory of science and education at Harvard – the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Opened in the 1859,  the MCZ has been a leader in fossil studies ever since.

Design in Nature
Agassiz’s interests spread beyond fish and glaciers. He sought the Plan of Creation, the key to understanding all of Nature. Was it  Evolution? No. Agassiz rejected any notion that natural processes somehow had transformed one species into another. He was a fierce exponent of the theory of Serial Creation: every species of fossil creature was created to fill its ecological role in its special geological time zone.

Darwin and Agassiz
Though he fought Darwin’s theories for his whole life, Agassiz’s work in fact provided support for the new views of evolution. The long trends in fish fins and scales were best explained by Natural Selection. Agassiz’s best students at Harvard went on to become strong supporters of Darwinism.  Endowed faculty positions were established in Agassiz’s name.  Agassiz Professorships were given to Alfred Sherwood Romer, the greatest Darwinian  paleontologist of the 20 century, and to Stephen Jay Gould, the most eloquent defender of Darwin in the last thirty years.

Don’t miss Archaeopteryx: Icon of Evolution, currently on display at HMNS. To read more about Agassiz and Darwin, check out my earlier blog.

del.icio.us this | digg this | Stumble It!      Email This Post Email This Post

Beauty is in the eye – or sometimes nose – of the beholder

Ed. Note:  Photos and links for the post were contributed by Zac Stayton

The amount of interest generated by the recent opening of Lois the corpse flower, aka Titan arum or Amorphophallus titanum, was phenomenal.  Some of Lois’s fans and followers have expressed concern that she may not have opened fully and that this meant something was “wrong” with her.  We have looked at lots of photos of other corpse flowers and we have to disagree.  Flowers, like people or any other living organism, have natural variation.  Some people are tall and skinny, some short and wide, some have dark skin, others white.  The same goes for dogs, elephants, sunflowers, and corpse flowers.  Diversity is the spice of life, and the foundation for the evolutionary process!

7.23.10 Amorphophallus titanum [7 am]
More photos available in our Flickr set

Here are links to photographs of other Titan arums.  You will note that some look very much like Lois, with a tall, narrow spathe that does not open out very wide, resembling an elegant vase.  Others have shorter, wider spathes and look more like upside-down bells – Perry, who recently bloomed in Minnesota, was this type.  Still others are more funnel-shaped, with the spathe not folding outwards much at all, such as this specimen that recently opened at Huntington Gardens

The spathe can open from either the right or left hand side, depending on how it is wrapped around the spadix.  Color, too, can vary, ranging from a deep, midnight purple that in some lights looks black, to burgundy or maroon.  The spadix can vary in height, thickness, and color as well (Perry’s spadix looked as if the top had been punched in).  Whatever their appearance, all corpse flowers are amazing and in their own strange way, beautiful! 

The most popular images on Google are of the bell shape, and this is the form often used in illustrations of the plant. All of us expected Lois to be the classic shape and color especially since she had never bloomed before. However, in nature the pollinating insects don’t care – they are homing in on the pungent odor.  Rotting carcasses vary in size and appearance too – but they all stink!

del.icio.us this | digg this | Stumble It!      Email This Post Email This Post

Texas’ Big Bend:A Photographic Adventure

Today’s guest blogger is Mike Marvins, a fourth generation portrait photographer. His photographs, featuring the wilderness of Big Bend National Park in Texas, are currently on display on the mezzanine of HMNS. In this post, Mike discusses his experiences at Big Bend National Park.
 
Texas’ Big Bend region has been a part of my life for over 40 years. As a new Scoutmaster, just off a four year stint as an officer in the Army, I was determined that my troop in Houston get a taste of high adventure backpacking. That first trip was a real learning experience for the boys and me. With July temperatures at over one hundred degrees on the Rio Grande we began the week with a downpour the first night. A real desert storm – and we had no tents. Even with all the hardships we were all entranced with the vastness and grandeur of Big Bend. That was the first of many, many trips – both with the Scouts and then with camping buddies and family.

Being a fourth generation portrait photographer,  the two months leading up to Christmas were filled with eighteen hour workdays. Then on December 26 each year, I would go off to Big Bend for some mind-clearing solitude. That’s the one thing most people have told me they treasure most about the area. 

My photography in Big Bend started with snapshots of the people who were sharing the experience with us. Then, came many years of pictures of things that just caught my attention. These were just personal mementos, tucked away in albums. They were not made with any publication, articles or exhibits in mind. That let me be creative and make pictures that truly came from the heart. They reflect both the incredible natural history of Big Bend and its human history as well.

Several years ago, friends and clients urged me to share my pictures with “the world.” That resulted in the book “Texas’ Big Bend; A Photographic Adventure From the Pecos To The Rio Grande,” published by Bright Sky Press in 2009. It’s the first book that encompasses the (850,000 acre) Big Bend National Park, Big Bend Ranch State Park, historic towns and ranches.  The exhibit, now on display at the Houston Museum of Natural Science,  is based on photographs from the book and prints that have been acquired by major art museums.

del.icio.us this | digg this | Stumble It!      Email This Post Email This Post

Lois: What Happens Next [Corpse Flower]

Corpse Flower Cutie!
Lois mania will soon die down, but we hope her
bloom has inspired kids like Elora
(who made this amazing hat with her mom!)
to stay excited about science.
Check out the rest of our Lois photos on Flickr.

NOTE: The last ticket time available to see Lois tonight will be 11 pm. The Museum returns to normal operating hours tomorrow, Monday, July 26. Lois will remain on display throughout this week, and the Lois webcam will remain live, while she works on returning to a dormant state.

Lois is nearing the end.  What a show it has been! This is what has happened over the past couple of days.

Friday, the female flowers inside Lois’s chamber (the swollen portion at the bottom of the spathe) became receptive.  When this happens, the big spadix starts to heat up to volatize the stinky pheromone (scent) and send it far and wide.  In nature, insects attracted to rotting, stinky stuff such as decaying bodies would come flocking, thinking they would find something good to eat or especially a place to lay their eggs.  Of course this is nothing but a trick.  The insects crawl down into the corpse flower’s chamber through small openings around the spadix where the spathe is constricted.  Hopefully these insects had already been fooled by another corpse flower, and so came bearing pollen (completely inadvertent on their part).  Once inside they would roam around,  scrambling over the flowers inside, looking for the rotting meat.  Alas, it is just a hoax, and they are trapped inside the chamber for 24 hours or so.  Meanwhile, the male flowers open to shed their pollen.  Only then are the insects able to crawl back out – and fly on to the next corpse flower, perhaps many miles away.

So – in Lois’s case, Friday her female flowers were receptive – so the stink was strongest to draw in pollinations.  Saturday, there were only faint remnants of her scent. The female flowers are no longer receptive; now it’s the males’ turn. We plan to collect some pollen to freeze (the best way to preserve its viability) so we can send it on to any other botanical garden that might want to fertilize their corpse flower when it blooms.

In Lois’s case, she is too young and too small to be pollinated.  It is very costly [Ed. note: hard on the plant] to produce that huge inflorescence (bloom) and to spend another year ripening the fruits might do her in.  Instead Lois is starting to wilt and her spadix will collapse soon.  We are not sure how fast this will happen, but the entire flowering structure will eventually crumble or rot and fall away, leaving only the tuber – which will have lost up to 25% of its weight.

At that point we will unearth Lois and examine her tuber to make sure she’s okay.  We will weigh her and dust her with powdered sulfur to prevent fungal and insect damage.  After the tuber dries out for a few days we will repot her in fresh soil, but will keep it quite dry until next spring, when we hope she will produce a leaf again.  It may be several more years before Lois has recuperated enough mass to bloom again.  We hope that next time her tuber will be much bigger and at that point, she might be able to survive the ordeal of producing fruit.

del.icio.us this | digg this | Stumble It!      Email This Post Email This Post